THE BILDERBERG
GROUP: AN IN DEPTH ANALYSIS.
Image: The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and
its partner organizations and corporate backers. A financial and ideological
arm of those in the US government and their corporate paymasters, who are
dedicated to the goal of Globalism.The partner organizations and financial backers of NED are
some of the most known names in their respective spheres of endeavour, for
instance Brookings Institute is a ‘think
tank” that concerns itself with foreign policy formation, and most of their
recommendations or projections, are actual policies already being enacted or on
the books in the American governmental apparatus. The Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), is another huge decider of American foreign policy, its
founders and financiers are an interesting lot to say the least, one of the
founders is Colonel Edward Mandelhouse John Foster Dulles (of Kuhn, Loeb
& Co.), and Allen Dulles (also of Kuhn, Loeb & Co). The CFR was
officially founded on July 29, 1921. Money for the founding came from J.P. Morgan,
Bernard Baruch, Otto Kahn, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, and John D. Rockefeller,
among others. The funding for the RIIA in London came primarily from the Astor family.
An appropriate quote from War on Syria is in order here: “US Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Joe Lieberman issued a
joint statement declaring that Bashar al- Assad had “lost the legitimacy to
remain in power in Syria.” They continued by stating: Rather than hedging our
bets or making excuses for the Assad regime, it is time for the United States,
together with our allies in Europe and around the world, to align ourselves
unequivocally with the Syrian people in their peaceful demand for a democratic
government. The US Senators’ statements remain unequivocally dishonest, as
McCain and Graham are both members of the International Republican Institute,
an organization openly implicated by the New York Times in funding opposition
groups who took part in the “Arab Spring.” Likewise, Lieberman is a member of
the Neo-Conservative lobbying firm deceptively named the “Foundation for
Defense of Democracies(FDD),” which features a host of Projects for a New
American Century (PNAC) signatories including William Kristol, Richard Perle,
James Woolsey, and Paula Dobriansky, as well as Council on Foreign Relations
members, Newt Gingrich and Charles Krauthammer”.The power of the corporate
elite is concentrated in the Bilderberg group, as I will show here using their
words as the proof to substantiate my claims. Daniel Estulin investigated and researched
the Bilderberg group for well over 14 years. Estulin’s “The True Story of The Bilderberg Group”: “Slowly, one by one, I
have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I
could not have done this without help of ‘conscientious objectors’ from inside,
as well as outside, the Group’s membership.” Estulin describes the Bilderberg group as a “Shadow
one World Government”. Estulin detailed how in 1954 the world’s power
elite congregated in: “the most powerful
men in the world met for the first time, in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, debated
the future of the world, and decided to meet annually in secret. They called
themselves the Bilderberg Group”. The membership of the group consists of a
who’s who of the world’s elite and powerful such as David Rockefeller, Henry
Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben
Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald
Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators,
congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European
royalty, selected media figures, and invited others, even President Obama and
many of his “top-officials”, have been
present at Bilderberg conferences. Always well represented are top figures from
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission,
EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB’s
Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England’s Mervyn King.
The objective of the Bilderberg group
is to supplant, nation-state sovereignty by a global government controlled by
corporations that are empowered by a militarized police state case in point
Ferguson Missouri. It will become increasingly difficult for the average
citizen to distinguish between the police and military, combat fatigues and
armored vehicles will be and is already fast becoming standard issue for police
departments globally, and particularly in the western hemisphere. Estulin wrote
the following in his book: “Imagine a
private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and
generals rub shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets
along, and where the people running the wars, markets, and Europe and America
say what they never dare say in public.”
“Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided “to create an ‘Aristocracy
of purpose’ between Europe and the United States (to reach consensus to rule
the world on matters of) policy, economics, and (overall) strategy.” NATO was
essential for their plans – to ensure “perpetual war (and) nuclear blackmail”
to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous
wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it” (quoted from Global
Research). The rules of the Bilderberg group’s steering committee are the
following: “the invited guests must come
alone; no wives, girlfriends, husbands or boyfriends. Personal assistants
(meaning security, bodyguards, CIA or other secret service protectors) cannot
attend the conference and must eat in a separate hall. (Also) The guests are
explicitly forbidden from giving interviews to journalists”. An elite
private club comprised of a global elite that rules the world and are “sworn to secrecy”. Estulin wrote the
following suggesting that Bill Clinton was
“allowed’, to become President of the US for the specific purpose of: “There,
David Rockefeller told (him) why the North American Free Trade Agreement….was a
Bilderberg priority and that the group needed him to support it. The next year,
Clinton was elected president”. Clinton attended the meeting in 1991 on
January 1st 1994 NAFTA went into effect. The Bilderberg group has a “Grand Design”, for the world which is
outlined in the following.
a One World Government (World Company)
with a single, global marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially
regulated by one ‘World (Central) Bank’ using one global currency.” Their objectives
are:
– “one international identify
(observing) one set of universal values;”
– centralized control of world
populations by “mind control;” in
other words, controlling world public opinion;
– a New World Order with no middle
class, only “rulers and servants
(serfs),” and, of course, no democracy;
– “a
zero-growth society” without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth
and power for the rulers;
– manufactured crises and perpetual
wars;
– Absolute control of education to
program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;
– “centralized control of all foreign
and domestic policies;” one size fits all globally;
– using the UN as a de facto world
government imposing a UN tax on “world
citizens;”
– expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;
– making NATO a world military;
– imposing a universal legal system;
and
– a global “welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and
non-conformists targeted for extermination.”
A prominent partner organization of
the Bilderberg group is the Council on Foreign relations. Edward Mandell House
a CFR foundation member was Woodrow Wilson’s, during House’ tenure the Federal
reserve Act was passed in December 1931, extending the power to create money to
bankers, the 16th Amendment was ratified in February creating the
federal income tax to provide a revenue stream to pay for government debt
service. The Trilateral Commission is another key organization that advances
the Globalist agenda. Founded by David Rockefeller a prominent Bilderberger and
a CFR Chairmen Emeritus, Rockefeller funds and supports the following organizations:
nearly all presidential candidates of both parties; leading senators and
congressmen; key members of the fourth estate and their bosses; and top
officials of the FBI, CIA, NSA, defence establishment, and other leading
government agencies, including state, commerce, the judiciary and treasury. The
global super-state advocacy of the CFR entails America and other western powers
ceding their sovereignty to a world power. The founder of CFR was a member of
Rosevelt’s “Brain Trust”.In 1950, his
son, James, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it – by
conquest or consent.”Henry Kissinger intoned at the 1992 Bilderberg
conference that: “Today, Americans would
be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they
will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an
outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very
existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world
leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly
relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government”. The United Nations
an instrumental organization in the power elites push to usher in a one world
government, according to Estulin was formed by: “the UN began with a group of
CFR members called the Informal Agenda Group.” The original UN proposal was
drafted by members of the CFR. According to Professor William Donhoff author of “Who Rules America” the CFR operates in
micro groups of twenty five operatives: “small groups of about twenty-five, who
bring together leaders from the six conspirator categories (industrialists,
financiers, ideologues, military, professional specialists – lawyers, medical
doctors, etc. – and organized labour) for detailed discussions of specific
topics in the area of foreign affairs”. Domhoff emphasized that: “The Council on Foreign Relations, while
not financed by government, works so closely with it that it is difficult to
distinguish Council action stimulated by government from autonomous actions.
(Its) most important sources of income are leading corporations and major
foundations,” most notably the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation and
the Carnegie Foundation are key corporate sponsors of the CFR. Richard Salant
former CBS news president outlined the corporate media’s role in the twisted
tangled web of global corporate hegemony: “Our job is to give people not what
they want, but what we decide they ought to have.” CFR influence in the
administrative process of America and indeed the western hemisphere is
staggering to say the least: The National Security Act of 1947 established the
office of Secretary of Defence.” Since then, 14 DOD secretaries have been
CFR members.
Since 1940, every Secretary of State,
except James Byrnes, has been a CFR member and/or Trilateral Commission (TC)
one.
For the past 80 years, “Virtually
every key US National Security and Foreign Policy Advisor has been a CFR
member.
Nearly all top generals and admirals
have been CFR members.
Many presidential candidates were/are
CFR members, including Herbert Hoover, Adlai Stevenson, Dwight Eisenhower, John
Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter (also a charter TC member),
George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and John McCain.
Numerous CIA directors were/are CFR
members, including Richard Helmes, James Schlesinger, William Casey, William
Webster, Robert Gates, James Woolsey, John Deutsch, George Tenet, Porter Goss,
Michael Hayden, and Leon Panetta.
Many Treasury Secretaries were/are CFR
members, including Douglas Dillon, George Schultz, William Simon, James Baker,
Nicholas Brady, Lloyd Bentsen, Robert Rubin, Henry Paulson, and Tim Geithner.
When presidents nominate Supreme Court
candidates, the CFR’s “Special Group,
Secret Team” or advisors vet them for acceptability. Presidents, in fact,
are told who to appoint, including designees to the High Court and most lower
ones. The dumbing down of the worlds population is not limited to the world of
pop-culture but permeates every facet of the human experience today, the
following are some examples: “According to sociologist Hadley Cantril in his
1967 book, The Human Dimension – Experiences in Policy Research:
Government “Psycho-political operations are propaganda campaigns designed to
create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept
the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”Canadian writer Ken Adachi (1929 –
1989) added:
“What most Americans believe to be ‘Public Opinion’ is in reality
carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioural
response from the public.”And noted Australian academic and activist Alex Carey (1922 – 1988)
explained the three most important 20th century developments – “The growth of democracy, the growth of
corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of
protecting corporate power against democracy.” (Quoted from Global Research). The Trilateral
Commission is another organization worth mentioning here, according to the
groups literature: “each regional group
has a chairman and deputy chairman, who all together constitute the leadership
of the Committee. The Executive Committee draws together a further 36
individuals from the wider membership”.Zbigniew Brzezinski (TC’s
co-founder), wrote in his Between Two Ages – America’s Role in the Technotronic
Era: “people, governments and economies
of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.
The Constitution is inadequate….the old framework of international politics,
with their sphere of influence….the fiction of sovereignty….is clearly no
longer compatible with reality….”The North American Union (NAU).The idea emerged during the Reagan
administration in the early 1980s. David Rockefeller, George Schultz and Paul
Volker told the president that Canada and America could be politically and
economically merged over the next 15 years except for one problem –
French-speaking Quebec. Their solution – elect a Bilderberg-friendly prime
minister, separate Quebec from the other provinces, then make Canada America’s
51st state. It almost worked, but not quite when a 1995 secession referendum
was defeated – 50.56% to 49.44%, but not the idea of merger.
At a March 23, 2005 Waco, Texas
meeting, attended by George Bush, Mexico’s Vincente Fox, and Canada’s Paul
Martin, the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) was launched, also known
as the North American Union (NAU). It was a secretive Independent Task Force of
North America agreement – a group organized by the Canadian Council of Chief
Executives (CCCE), the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations, and CFR with the
following aims:
– circumventing the legislatures of
three countries and their constitutions;
– suppressing public knowledge or
consideration; and
– proposing greater US, Canadian and
Mexican economic, political, social, and security integration with secretive
working groups formed to devise non-debatable, not voted on agreements to be binding
and unchangeable.
In short – a corporate coup d’etat
against the sovereignty of three nations enforced by hard line militarization
to suppress opposition.
If enacted, it will create a
borderless North America, corporate controlled, without barriers to trade or
capital flows for business giants, mainly US ones and much more – America’s
access to vital resources, especially oil and Canada’s fresh water.
Secretly, over 300 SPP initiatives
were crafted to harmonize the continent’s policies on energy, food, drugs,
security, immigration, manufacturing, the environment, and public health along
with militarizing three nations for enforcement.
SPP represents another step toward the
Bilderberg/Trilateralist/CFR goal for World Government, taking it one step at a
time. A “United Europe” was another,
the result of various treaties and economic agreements:
– The December 1951 six-nation
European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC);
– The March 1957 six-nation Treaty of
Rome establishing the European Economic Community (EEC);
Also the European Atomic Energy
Commission (EAEC) by a second Treaty of Rome;
– The October 1957 European Court of
Justice to settle regional trade disputes;
– The May 1960 seven-nation European
Free Trade Association (EFTA);
– The July 1967 European Economic
Community (EEC) merging the ECSC, EAEC and EEC together in one organization;
– The 1968 European Customs Union to
abolish duties and establish uniform imports taxing among EEC nations;
– The 1978 European Currency Unit
(ECU);
– The February 1986 Single European
Act revision of the 1957 Treaty of Rome; it established the objective of
forming a Common Market by December 31, 1992;
– The February 1992 Maastricht Treaty
creating the EU on November 1, 1993; and
– The Euro was adopted in December
1995; it was introduced in January 1999 replacing the European Currency Unit
(ECU); Euros began circulating on January 2002; they’re now the official
currency of 16 of the 27 EU states.
Over half a century, the above steps
cost EU members their sovereignty “as some 70 to 80 per cent of the laws passed
in Europe involve just rubber stamping of regulations already written by
nameless bureaucrats in ‘working groups’ in Brussels or Luxembourg.”
The EU and NAU share common features:
– Advocacy from a influential
spokesperson;
– An economic and later political
union;
– Hard line security, and for Europe,
ending wars on the continent between EU member states;
– Establishment of a collective
consciousness in place of nationalism;
– The blurring of borders and creation
of a “supra-government,” a
superstate;
– Secretive arrangements to mask real
objectives; and
– The creation of a common currency
and eventual global one.
Steps toward a North American Union
– The October 4, 1988 Free Trade
Agreement (FTA) between the US and Canada, finalized the previous year;
– At the 1991 Bilderberg meeting,
David Rockefeller got Governor Bill Clinton’s support for NAFTA if he became
president;
– On January 1, 1994, with no debate
under “fast-track” rules, Congress
approved WTO legislation;
– In December 1994 at the first Summit
of the Americas, 34 hemispheric leaders committed their nations to a Free Trade
of the Americas agreement (FTAA) by 2005 – so far unachieved;
–On July 4, 2000, Mexican president Vicente
Fox called for a North American common market in 20 years;
– On February 2001, the White House
published a joint statement from George Bush and Vicente Fox called the
“Guanajuato Proposal;” it was for a US-Canada-Mexico prosperity partnership
(aka North American Union);
– In September 2001, Bush and Fox
agreed to a “Partnership for Prosperity
Initiative;”– The September 11, 2001 attack gave
cover to including “security” as part
of a future partnership;
– On October 7, 2001, a CFA meeting
highlighted “The Future of North American Integration in the Wake of Terrorist
Attacks; for the first time, “security”
became part of a future “partnership for prosperity;” also, Canada was to
be included in a “North American” agreement;
– In 2002, the North American Forum on
Integration (NAFI) was established in Montreal
“to address the issues raised by North American integration as well as identify
new ideas and strategies to reinforce the North American region;”
– In January 2003, the Canadian
Council of Chief Executives (CCCE – composed of 150 top CEOs) launched the “North American Security and Prosperity
Initiative” calling for continental integration;
– In April 2004, Canadian Prime
Minister Paul Martin announced the nation’s first ever national security policy
called Securing an Open Society;
– On October 15, 2004, CFR established
an Independent Task Force on the Future of North America – for a future
continental union;
– In March 2005, a CFR report titled
Creating a North American Community called for continental integration by 2010 “to enhance, prosperity, and opportunity for
all North Americans;” and
– On March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas,
America, Canada and Mexico leaders launched the Security and Prosperity Partnership
(SPP) – aka North American Union (NAU).
Secretive negotiations continue.
Legislative debate is excluded, and public inclusion and debate are off the
table. In May 2005, the CFR Independent Task Force on the Future of North
America published a follow-up report titled Building a North American Community
– proposing a borderless three-nation union by 2010.
In June and July 2005, the Dominican
Republic – Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) passed the Senate
and House establishing corporate-approved trade rules to further impoverish the
region and move a step closer to continental integration.
In March 2006, the North American
Competitiveness Council (NACC) was created at the second SPP summit in Cancun,
Mexico. Composed of 30 top North American CEOs, it serves as an official
trilateral SPP working group.
Secret business and government
meetings continue so there’s no way to confirm SPP’s current status or if
Barack Obama is seamlessly continuing George Bush’s agenda. In an earlier
article, this writer said:
SPP efforts paused during the Bush to
Obama transition, but “deep integration”
plans remain. Canada’s Fraser Institute proposed renaming the initiative the
North American Standards and Regulatory Area (NASRA) to disguise its real
purpose. It said the “SPP brand” is
tarnished so re-branding is essential – to fool the public until it’s too late
to matter.
Bilderbergers, Trilaterists, and CFR
leaders back it as another step toward global integration and won’t “stop until the entire world is unified
under the auspices and the political umbrella of a One World Company, a
nightmarish borderless world run by the world’s most powerful clique” –
comprised of key elitist members of these dominant organizations.
In April 2007, the Transatlantic
Economic Council was established between America and the EU to:
– Create an “official international
governmental body – by executive fiat;
– Harmonize economic and regulatory
objectives;
– Move toward a Transatlantic Common
Market; and
– A step closer to One World Government
run by the world’s most powerful corporate interests.
Insights into the 2009 Bilderberg
Group Meeting
From May 14 – 17, Bilderbergers held
their annual meeting in Vouliagmeni, Greece, and according to Daniel Estulin
have dire plans for global economies.
According to his pre-meeting sources,
they’re divided on two alternatives:
“Either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to
decades of stagnation, decline and poverty (or) an intense but shorter
depression that paves the way for a new sustainable world order, with less
sovereignty but more efficiency.”Other agenda items included:
– “The
future of the US dollar and US economy;”
– Continued deception about green
shoots signalling an end to recession and improving economy later in the year;
– Suppressing the fact that bank
stress tests were a sham and were designed for deception, not an accurate
assessment of major banks’ health;
– Projecting headlined US unemployment
to hit 14% by year end – way above current forecasts and meaning the true
number will be double, at minimum, with all uncounted categories included; and
– A final push to get the Lisbon
Treaty passed for pan-European (EU) adoption of neoliberal rules, including
greater privatizations, fewer worker rights and social benefits open border
trade favouring developed over emerging states, and greater militarization to
suppress civil liberties and human rights.
After the meeting, Estulin got a
73-page report on what was discussed. He noted that “One of Bilderberg’s primary concerns….is the danger that their zeal to
reshape the world by engineering chaos (toward) their long term agenda could
cause the situation to spiral out of control and eventually lead to a scenario
where Bilderberg and the global elite in general are overwhelmed by events and
end up losing their control over the planet.”
Estulin also noted some considerable
disagreement between “hardliners”
wanting a “dramatic decline and a severe,
short-term depression (versus others) who think that things have gone too far” so
that “the fallout from the global
economic cataclysm” can’t be known, may be greater than anticipated, and
may harm Bilderberger interests. Also, “some
European bankers (expressed great alarm over their own fate and called the
current) high wire act ‘unsustainable.’
There was a combination of agreement
and fear that the situation remains dire and the worst of the crisis lies
ahead, mainly because of America’s extreme debt level that must be resolved to
produce a healthy, sustainable recovery.
Topics also included:
Establishing a Global Treasury
Department and Global Central Bank, possibly partnered with or as part of the
IMF; a global currency; destruction of the dollar through what long-time market
analyst Bob Chapman calls “a stealth
default on (US) debt by continuing to issue massive amounts of money and credit
and in the process devaluing the dollar,” a process he calls “fraud;”a global legal system; exploiting
the Swine Flu, Ebola and many other manufactured man-made viruses, scare to create
a WHO global department of health; and the overall goal of a global government
and the end of national sovereignty.
Comments
Post a Comment